Wikileaks and Assange – complicated but compulsory reading
I’ve let my thinking about Julian Assange and Wikileaks swing one way and then the other in the last 10 days – and make no apologies for what you might call being quick to change position but I’d rather say is being open minded. The work done by Wikileaks and its founder is so important that it bears time and attention to work out what’s going on as best we can.
Assange’s publisher Colin Robinson added some excellent perspective today in the Guardian, following on from what was a lengthy but revealing and insightful recent piece by would-be Assange ghost writer Andrew O’Hagan. It prompted me to write the following comment in response to the Guardian piece.
Great to have this counter point to O’Hagan’s piece – this is valuable material.
I disagree with you on this bit, the second sentence:
O’Hagan’s LRB piece is no part of an organised dirty tricks campaign. But by focusing as it does on Assange’s character defects, it ends up serving much the same purpose.
O’Hagan’s piece is essential to understanding where all the confusion arises from in all things Assange.
I read it as a huge admirer of what Assange has achieved. I concluded it thinking that Wikileaks and/or its founder were done – too difficult to work with to the point of taking themselves out of the equation on these issues.
Your piece has re-opened my thoughts on this – so I’m grateful for that.
Must get my copy of Cypherpunks.